has never been universal impact on every individual, social groups and communities.
as fourth pillar of state played an important role for stabilizing the society,
but one of the dimension that effect paradigm is the media coverage of
terrorist attacks on schools, on the parents. The media not only adopts some of
the language used by the terrorist organization but it also has been pointed
out that many times the news media automatically adopts the taxonomy of the
government (De Graaf). In the race of rating they never thought that they are creating
chaos in the society. On 16 December 2014 six day after Malala yousaf zai receive
Nobel prize the news start that “The
failure is total and collective — civil and military, provincial and federal.
Whether out of fear, incompetence, complicity or a combination of all three,
the state has allowed extremism in society to fester. There will be no final
victory against terrorism in Pakistan unless extremism is also defeated”. DAWAN
NEWS (2014). This brings to an end our live coverage of the storming of the
army-run school in Peshawar by Taliban gunmen. The attack left at least 141
people dead – 132 of them children – and many others wounded. BBC London
(2014). Words influence and limit ideas which can transferred from one to
The literature abounds on the subject
especially in specialized journals on terrorism, anthologies, books and policy
reports released by think tanks, research organizations and the governments. Consequently,
much work seems to have been done to understand implications of media coverage
on variety of social actors including parents.
Research largely could finds
an alliance between watching media coverage of terrorist attacks and stress
syndrome. However, most studies cannot answer the important question of whether
watching television of the event makes people worse or if people who have more
relentless stress reactions are the ones who choose to watch more television
coverage of the event.